Where should Christians draw the line?
Cultural norms surrounding gender, sex, and marriage have evolved significantly since the Bible was written. In the past century, as women and LGBT people have pushed for equal rights, Christians have fiercely debated which parts of the Bible’s teachings about sex and gender should endure and which parts should be read as a product of their time.
In the past few years the United Methodist church has split over whether to allow LGBT ministers to lead congregations and the Southern Baptist Convention has expelled churches for allowing women to preach. Christians have been vocal in political debates about transgender rights as questions about what the Bible says about sex and gender continue to consume Christian discourse.
Central to these discussions is the concept of “biblical inerrancy”-- the idea that every verse in the Bible is the literal word of God. While some Christians take this view of scripture, many point out that the Bible features a number of teachings that are both complex and seemingly contradictory. The versions of the Bible we read are all translated from the original Greek, and those translations imperfectly capture the author’s original words. Many Christian leaders warn that there is a danger to taking single verses out of context and advocate for a more holistic view of scripture that takes into account the author’s historical context.
A growing number of Christians believe that the Bible does not endorse traditional gender roles and does not condemn gay marriage due to scholarship that challenges these claims. Still, many Christians believe that the Bible espouses "traditional” views on sex, marriage, and gender.
What role should tradition play in how we interpret the Bible? Which traditions should we shelve and how do we decide? As cultural norms continue to shift, where should Christians draw the line?
It depends on how you interpret the Bible’s teachings about faith and the law.
How Christians across the political spectrum have answered this question
“Christians should affirm and celebrate everyone equally, regardless of their gender, sexuality, sexual choices, or family structure.”
Paul advocated for the full inclusion of Gentiles in the early church, condemned legalism, worked with women leaders, and called for grace. If he were alive today, he‘d think differently about sex & gender than he did in his own time.
Looking at the original Greek, it’s not clear that Paul’s statements about homosexuality translate to a modern context. He did not intend for his words to be taken out of context and used to justify discrimination.
Paul’s views on gender were radical for his time— they pushed back on Roman patriarchy. We should read his views on gender as a product of their time.
Jesus does not condemn homosexuality or assign gender roles. Paul’s words are secondary to Jesus’.
Paul was an evangelist. We should follow his example and not draw lines around Christianity. We should aim to be as inclusive as possible.
Paul’s letters were used to justify American slavery. We now agree that that was wrong. Efforts to use specific verses from Paul’s letters to enforce specific gender roles or behaviors are similarly oppressive, and we should not repeat the mistakes of previous Christians.
“Christians should affirm ‘traditional’ ideas about gender, sexuality, sex, marriage, and family. This includes affirming that there are different roles for men and women, that gender is assigned at birth, that marriage is between one man and one woman, that sex should not happen outside of marriage, and that a traditional nuclear family should be everyone’s goal.”
Paul clearly cared a lot about “sexual immorality“ as well as gender roles. We can‘t pretend otherwise.
Paul’s thoughts about sex and gender are clear from the text. We shouldn’t complicate it with overly involved scholarship about his cultural context or the original Greek.
Paul’s words are just as important as Jesus’. The Bible is the Bible and every part is important.
Paul wanted Christians to draw the line when it came to “sexual sin” because otherwise, what’s the point of Christianity? We have to draw the line somewhere. Shouldn’t there be some kind of standard for sexual ethics that we can agree on? Shouldn’t that standard be based in scripture?
Some Christians are looking for an excuse to throw out all of the rules that have historically governed gender, sex, marriage, and family. This attitude is dangerous and is why we see the disintegration of social norms in the modern era.
Paul’s Letters
The Apostle Paul’s letters to early Christians comprise nearly half of the books in the New Testament. Together, these letters paint a picture of a man who cared deeply about building a church that was both righteous and inclusive. As we covered in the last section, Paul advocated emphatically for the inclusion of Gentiles in the early church. Many other Christians at the time disagreed with him, arguing that Gentiles were sinners according to the law laid out in scripture because they were uncircumcised. These Christians wanted to accept only circumcised Jews into their new religion. But Paul was adamant that the apostles open up Christianity to Gentiles and went to great lengths in his letters to attempt to persuade other Christians to abandon their narrow view of Jewish law-- which they cited as the reason for the Gentiles’ exclusion. He argues that Christians should extend grace to Gentiles just as Jesus extended grace to all people and abandon the idea that people are saved by good works or behavior. The inclusion of Gentiles in the church played a big role in its growth, and set the stage for Christianity to become a major world religion.
But while Paul argues that Christians are not justified by works, he also writes at length about the righteous behaviors that Christians should adopt. Christians, he says, should be generous, humble, loving, patient, and kind and should avoid engaging in theft or idolatry. He encourages reverence and at multiple points instructs slaves to be obedient to their masters. Many Christians focus on Paul’s guidance about sex and gender roles. He repeatedly warns early Christians to avoid sexual immorality and instructs women to submit to their husbands, avoid divorce, wear head coverings, and be silent in churches and assemblies– though he appears to contradict this last instruction in a letter where he acknowledges the leadership of a number of women in early churches. Some scholars see Paul’s thoughts on gender as ahead of their time, because in the context of ancient Rome, they were progressive. Roman patriarchy emphasized women’s submission to men, but Paul pushed back on that cultural norm by also calling for men to not treat their wives harshly.
Some Christians interpret two sets of verses in Paul’s letters to be a condemnation of homosexuality, though the exact meaning of those verses in the original Greek and within Paul’s cultural context has been disputed. For example, some scholars believe, based on the Greek words Paul used and the social context of Paul’s critique, that he meant to specifically condemn sexual relationships between men and boys, prostitution, or sexually abusive behavior— not marriage between people of the same gender.
Paul’s letters have been a source of debate throughout American Christian history. In the 1800s, many Christians used Paul’s letters to oppose giving women the right to vote as well as the abolition of slavery. In the past century, Paul’s views on gender and homosexuality have shaped debates about who can participate in church or serve in ministry, as many denominations have begun to welcome women and LGBT people into their leadership. How should we approach Paul’s letters in light of the tensions in them and the evolution of social norms? How should we view his push to include Gentiles and his views on sex & gender in light of modern debates about sex and gender? If Paul were alive today, who would he have pushed for us to include?
As you read selections from these letters, consider the role that tradition should play in our reading of the Bible, our faith practice, and our politics.
Read the New Testament passages
How these passages build on the Old Testament
Christians who emphasize inclusion look to Paul’s reinterpretation of the purpose of laws in the Old Testament. Paul makes multiple references to the Hebrew Bible to make the case that Gentiles should be included in the Christian faith. In his letter to the Galatians, Paul writes that Abraham’s faith was the source of his righteousness, rather than his adherence to the law. Paul argues that this means that anyone who believes in God is righteous just as Abraham was, even if they don’t follow the letter of the law, because believers are Abraham’s “descendants.”
Later in the passage, he writes that the promise God made to Abraham to bless his offspring and make a great nation applies to all who believe— including Gentiles. The law, he argues, came 430 years after God’s promise to Abraham, and it didn’t “annul” that promise. This “law” Paul refers to is Mosaic law, which includes the Ten Commandments, the covenant codes laid out in Exodus, the Holiness Codes in Leviticus, and other laws in Deuteronomy. Paul claims that the law served a different purpose before Jesus, but that Christ’s coming changed the purpose of the law. Jesus’ coming meant that the purpose of the law was no longer to discipline people. Instead, “There is no longer Jew or Greek; there is no longer slave or free; there is no longer male and female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to the promise.” This means that Gentiles must be included in the Christian faith.
In this same letter, Paul also refers to the curse of the law, which is described in Deuteronomy. In this part of Deuteronomy, God laid out for the Israelites the blessings they would receive if they obeyed the law, and the curses they would receive if they disobeyed. Paul writes that “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us,” meaning that who have faith but who disobey the law will no longer be cursed.
Christians who emphasize “traditional” views on gender, sex, marriage, and family have a different view of the Old Testament. In 1 Timothy, Paul writes that women should not have authority over men and he cites the second Genesis creation story, saying that women were created after men, that Eve perpetrated original sin, and that as a result, women are “saved through childbearing.”
While Paul does not make other direct references to the Hebrew Bible in his teachings on these topics, modern Christians frequently reference various parts of it. For example, many Christians frequently cite Proverbs 31, which describes an ideal woman, in conversations about gender roles.
Some Christian feminists have pushed back on this “traditional” view of women in the Old Testament, emphasizing the role of women such as Deborah, the judge and military leader, and Esther, the queen who bravely intervened on behalf of the Jewish people, resulting in their deliverance. Many Christians have also debated the meaning of two verses in Leviticus that reference homosexuality. Some believe that these verses condemn all homosexual relationships, while others believe that these verses refer to certain kinds of inappropriate sexual encounters, such as pedophilia.
As you read these passages, consider the ways in which they inform how we interpret Paul and the relevance of his writing today.
Read the Old Testament passages
Now that you’ve read the scripture…
Reflect
What are you thinking and feeling right now?
Request
Ask God to open your heart and your mind to a different perspective. Challenge yourself to see another point of view— even if you don’t agree with it.
Respond
Thank God for working through scripture and through the people around you. If you’re about to discuss this section with other people, pray for them and for your time together.
Questions for reflection & discussion
Why do you think Paul warned Christians about sexual immorality? What do you think he meant by “sexual immorality” and how would you define it? What parts of his teachings on this do you think are relevant today?
Why do you think Paul emphasized different gender roles? Do you think his teachings on gender are relevant today? Why or why not?
Do you think church leaders should be held to different standards for sexual morality? Why or why not? How would you define those standards?
Christians in the 1800s used Paul’s letters to justify slavery and oppose women’s suffrage. Today, Christians agree that that was wrong. What did Christians get wrong then and how can we avoid making the same mistake today?
Some Christians have rejected parts of Paul’s letters- his teachings on male headship or the role of women for example- while embracing other parts - such as his views on homosexuality. Do you pick and choose which parts of the Bible you accept as true? If so, how do you decide what to accept or reject? If not, how do you reconcile the contradictions in Paul’s thinking? What issues do you consider to be “secondary” in your faith?
Paul says many times that Christians are justified by faith alone, not adherence to the law. How do you reconcile that with his emphasis on righteous behaviors? How do you think he would respond to modern debates about gender, sex, and family?
In his directions for marriage, Paul says that “It is good for a man to not touch a woman. But because of cases of sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband.” Do you agree with this? How do you think Paul felt about the “traditional nuclear family” structure?
Do you think that everyone should aim to have a traditional nuclear family? Why or why not? What role do you think the traditional nuclear family should play in modern society?
Do you think that Christians should draw lines around who we include or exclude? If so, how should we decide who to include? If not, how can we ensure that our faith is still meaningful?
Submit your feedback!
Your feedback matters and will make the site better for other readers. Please include in your message which section(s) you’re submitting feedback about and any specific changes that you think would improve the materials.